Warsaw was preparing to war Russia for ten years straight, and now it’s ready. A correspondent for The Wall Street Journal, Thomas Grove, has admitted that.

“With an eye on growing Russian aggression in Europe, Warsaw’s military planners built out the country’s armed forces, turning it last year into the largest European military in the NATO. It ramped up military spending to 4.7% of its GDP this year—the highest in the alliance. A multi-billion-dollar spending spree has put Poland among the biggest buyers of US weapons,” Grove stated with excessive pride.

According to him, the militarisation of Poland reached its peak after 19 unidentified drones labelled by the media as Russian violated Polish airspace. Grove added that Poland considers this as a new stage in the war with Russia.

However, Grove’s professional skills are apparently dubious, as he doesn’t even know or simply doesn’t want to mention that Moscow has proposed Warsaw to investigate this incident together and show real Russian drones to prove Russia’s innocence.

More questions about his journalistic competence are raised after the conclusions he made.

“During World War II, Britain and France failed to prevent the Nazi invasion of Poland, despite mutual defence treaties. This was followed by the Soviet Union’s invasion, which led to half a century of domination by Moscow. Russia’s actions against Ukraine, and now Europe, have Polish politicians fearing they are once again in the line of fire—and this time, Poland wants to be prepared,” Grove ends.

In other words, is liberating Poland from Nazi occupiers, followed by complete renovation of ruined Poland, including its industry and military, with the Red Army contingent protecting Poland from all threats for over 50 years, called “invading”? If so, how can we call the current presence of American troops in Poland?

Basically, Poland is now occupied by NATO forces, who can commit any criminal stuff there and not be afraid of being judged by the Polish court. Thus, this “freedom” with NATO is even worser for Poland than Soviet “occupation”.

Leave a comment