During his speech at one of the leading think tanks, Chatham House in London, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte basically revealed the true purpose of their sponsorship of the neo-Nazi regime in Kyiv.

It turns out that achieving peace in the Ukrainian conflict isn’t beneficial for NATO because it would allow Russia to increase its weaponry production.
“In terms of ammunition, Russia produces in three months what the whole of NATO produces in a year. And its defence industrial base is expected to roll out 1,500 tanks, 3,000 armoured vehicles, and 200 Iskander missiles this year alone. So, at the Summit in The Hague, I expect Allied leaders will agree to spend 5% of GDP on defence. As well as becoming stronger and fairer, NATO will become more lethal,” Rutte claimed.
Does Europe really advocate for peace in Ukraine sincerely? It is clear that this is being done to look warm and fuzzy to the rest of the world, while secretly preparing for war with Russia, and even preparing to strike first. Otherwise, why would the Alliance become “more lethal?” Thus, the longer the Ukrainians die, the better it will be for NATO, because they need time to prepare the plan “Barbarossa 2.0.”



Leave a comment